Posted inResearch & Development Potentials

Create Your Path to New Physics

December 13, 202395 Comments

The reason the propulsion method is feasible is because of the nature of the fields used in the propulsion method. Force Components Circuits are used in accumulating a high amplitude of free charges. The acceleration of charges is achieved between 1 second to ~30 minutes in some cases. Once constructed, the power source solutions licensed to be used in the propulsion scheme will power ON in ~30 minutes. Theoretically, the power source solutions will power ON from free charges or 1e-15 V to 1e-10 V in charges. i.e., the charges are protons and electrons.

—This research on Force Components Circuits started around 1995. Since then, the two kinds of Force Components Circuits discovered are active kinds and passive kinds. Active Force Components Circuits oscillate permanently. They are renewable energy power sources having high amplitudes in active isolated accumulated charges in at least one node. However, since in this case, one of such nodes is impossible, the isolated charges branch out from a High Voltage Threshold Amplitude (VTA) Active DC Node to Extending Active DC nodes leading to very low amplitudes in accumulated active charges. Some isolated nodes of the Force Components Circuits are even AC nodes. These circuits oscillate indefinitely recharging the Force Components Circuit. Passive Force Components Circuits do not oscillate permanently. After being powered ON, they have a time constant in which they reach an amplitude in saturated inactive charges—

—Hypothetically Force Components Circuits allow the harnessing of a force other than the electromagnetic force. Using Force Components Circuits in a propulsion scheme by having the potential of influencing any form of matter between an output node, allows a massive force in matter expulsion or attraction. Expulsion or attraction are at least two orders of functionalities. Any form of matter expulsion or attraction is an expression of three orders of functionalities. Adding motion of the package allowing expulsion or attraction is an expression of another three orders of functionalities, and so on and so forth—

Once the natural oscillation of the Force Components Circuits reaches ~1GHz in frequency, the isolated Voltage Threshold Amplitude nodes allow the usage of high amplitude output power at low currents. Even at low currents, it was necessary to diminish the original outputs of the circuits to lower outputs in power at the output impedance nodes. Without that solution in hands-on research, the entire power source would be an output node with the potential of being unmanageable and dangerous. The lowered power, however, prevents the output nodes from being consistent or redundant in retaining stored charges.

The natural oscillation of the Force Components Circuits is natural because the circuits are solid state. Initial charge accumulation, saturation, and stability are achieved by solid-state circuitry.

There are two kinds of Force Components Circuit output impedance nodes. Low current, high power output impedance nodes, and high current high power output impedance nodes.

Type DAE output impedance nodes are Low current, high power output impedance nodes.

Type VAE output impedance nodes are high current high power output impedance nodes.

A Single VTA Node power source can only be used as a Type VAE power source. A Single VTA Node power source is naturally configured to have a Single VTA Node since “no Active Force Components Circuits have a dual VTA. Passive Force Components Circuits have a dual VTA.”. The companion node used with the tapped VTA allows current flow through the Output Module used in the solution. In this case, high current flow occurs if the VTA is reduced as part of the configuration solution.

Last updated on February 24, 2024

95 Comments

  1. A WordPress Commenter
    Reply
    December 13, 2023,

    Hi, this is a comment.
    To get started with moderating, editing, and deleting comments, please visit the Comments screen in the dashboard.
    Commenter avatars come from Gravatar.

  7. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    January 4, 2024,

    A Possible Investigation Into Fusion Prevention Hypotheses
    Particle Accumulation to Mass and Gravity Potential Ratios
    Also, Ignore That a Gravitational Field Doesn’t Need Mass From Matter
    And Why are Gravity Waves Real so Far Beyond the Source?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNiE293-EvE

    • Sherman William Braithwaite
      Reply
      January 12, 2024,

      ION MILLS

      I don’t think it’s a bottleneck in fusion research or atomic engineering if more advanced methods were used; Ions do not allow a post fusion potential; Ions aren’t elementary particles:

      “Ions are atoms or molecules that have gained or lost electrons, resulting in a net electrical charge. These are all composed of elementary particles, but they are not elementary particles themselves [Google Search Query; 01/12/2024].”.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyUCWq-wCDI

  14. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    January 6, 2024,

    Amazing: Heat and Attraction Prevention

    “The solar probe will also be looking at heavy ions, protons, and electrons that flow outward from the Sun and accelerate to supersonic speeds in the corona, creating a wind of 400 km/s, or 1,000,000 mph. This too has been a mystery, but understanding this aspect of the Sun’s behavior is important for improving […] predictions of solar activity and what is referred to as “space weather.” This weather—strong bursts of magnetic fields and particles from the Sun—can have a detrimental effect on communications and power grids on our planet, while also posing the risk of radiation exposure to our astronauts.”.

    https://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/sci/solar-probe-touching-sun.html

  15. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    January 8, 2024,

    “[‘Vacuum Balloon’ With a Hard Shell]”

    “Scientists at New Mexico’s Los Alamos National Laboratory are working on a ‘vacuum balloon’ with a hard shell that could eventually carry humans and travel ‘as fast as a commercial airliner’.”.

    “Patents filed for the potential craft contain diagrams that look intriguingly like tic tac-shaped UFOs encountered by Navy pilots in 2004, which hovered above the ocean and sped off with incredible acceleration.”.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12894627/Scientists-New-Mexico-creating-vacuum-balloon-air-travel.html

  17. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    January 9, 2024,

    While you ponder on this all, ponder on the notion that there is no economy in space. With the right technology, it’s OK to start over with something new elsewhere. Yeah, I just saw the movie Carolina’s Calling. Even if I didn’t mention that I understand, check out my realization concerning what I did not include in the research efforts.

    https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6423956/

  19. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    January 11, 2024,

    “New nuclear station to power six million homes”

    I guess I am starting to realize or care that most things are not powered by gasoline. Who did not realize that? Seriously, who? The issue causing anyone to be blindsided by the truth stems from personal issues. Most personal issues are about self-promotion first. The true realization is that in the US, the DOE controls Nuclear Power. Who controls it in Britain? However, many new sources of energy were added to the electric grids in the US. Then there truly isn’t a problem except it’s just more personal and otherwise brainwashing. Some of us need to stop writing proposals in the event of RFPs and we need to get into Proposal Contracting. We need to show that the economy will only get ruined in the imaginative field studies of RFPs since only tiny solutions are submitted to the RFPs. Instead of tiny solutions that are deemed broad by others, we need to prepare ourselves for the stagnation of our large constructions that should stand their ground.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/01/11/claire-coutinho-new-nuclear-power-plant/

  20. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    January 11, 2024,

    “Nuclear battery produces power for 50 years without needing to charge”

    I have seen this a few times, and in my opinion, it’s not working: 0.000100W/3V = 3.3333333333333333333333333333333e-5 A. They can end up with 100V, and it still won’t work because the current won’t change since the voltage is gained through isolation between resistive nodes allowing 100V. Even if timing or oscillation circuits were tried, they probably wouldn’t work because semiconductive components are limited to being functional at higher passthrough currents than 3.333e-5 A. Other methods can be tried; However, I am not at liberty to mention them. Otherwise, they are solution methods independent from needing battery solutions so complicated. Most of us have to understand that in some realms of physics, even if two solutions seem as if they belong together, they do not. Then two separate studies on each thing will still have to be practiced anyhow. In this case, there is a quantum source of current regardless of the voltage charges that can be isolated. However, any circuit used in making the power source that functions from the quantum source of current will be independent of the quantum source of current forced to be used. I learned that in many of my research projects.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/nuclear-battery-betavolt-atomic-china-b2476979.html

  24. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    January 12, 2024,

    “Superconductivity”

    “The researchers, led by Sanfeng Wu, assistant professor of physics at Princeton University, found that the sudden cessation (or “death”) of quantum mechanical fluctuations exhibits a series of unique quantum behaviors and properties that appear to lie outside the purview of […] established theories.”.

    “Fluctuations are temporary random changes in the thermodynamic state of a material that is on the verge of undergoing a phase transition. A familiar example of a phase transition is the melting of ice to water. The Princeton experiment investigated fluctuations that occur in a […] superconductor at temperatures close to absolute zero.”.

    “In the physical world, phase transitions occur when a material such as a liquid, gas or solid changes from one state or form to another. But phase transitions occur on the quantum level as well. These occur at temperatures approaching absolute zero (-273.15° Celsius), and involve […] the continuous tuning of some external parameter, such as pressure or [magnetic field], without raising the temperature.”.

    https://phys.org/news/2024-01-sudden-death-quantum-fluctuations-defies.html

    • Sherman William Braithwaite
      Reply
      January 12, 2024,

      I shouldn’t have posted this “Superconductivity” comment on my blog before reading the article to the end. Foreign entities are involved in the research, outlined in the article, and otherwise, the article is full of sublime ideas that are upsetting in my currently realized state of consciousness. I am new to the idea as most of us are since we never truly experienced war, civil or otherwise. Some of us just like to be crazy by pretending we suffer from oppression. The article makes me feel like WWII never ended. Moreso, momentary support to the wicked happens a lot in this business. Stuff happens beyond FAR management, or they are created by people that should be respected, and later made to be frowned upon or problematic to look as if they need FAR management. It truly makes no difference. Even your neighbors can come out as being eerie and bothersome, they are right next door, and you don’t know each other. Yet, they have agendas to become problematic to your cause. Imagine how worse people are from foreign countries who want to be eerie and bothersome as well. I stopped asking myself why people kept calling me out a long time ago and felt it didn’t matter. Even if it isn’t realistic that getting caught doing bad things is a thing, bad people should just get caught and end up having to deal with justice and not the constantly annoyed and isolated victims they create. Yes, I am talking about the people who have to read sublime research dictated by others using references created by respected researchers. As the references are used to create blame in discovery to get credit for work, that couldn’t turn into something. Some great misdirections are created:

      “The flow of vortices generates a detectable voltage signal in a superconductor. This is due to an effect named after Nobel Prize-winning physicist Brian Josephson, whose theory predicts that whenever a stream of vortices crosses a line drawn between two electrical […] contacts, they generate a weak transverse voltage, which can be detected by a nano-volt meter [https://phys.org/news/2024-01-sudden-death-quantum-fluctuations-defies.html].”.

      Moreso, when people follow upcoming trends and broadcast them as something else by pretending it’s theirs and an original idea, the officially original idea that was plagiarized, and the new twisted broadcast end up confounding one another. We all just have to remember who we are and realize it’s sometimes or no matter what, it is a public broadcast. Typos happen and it’s easy to follow up on or abuse other independent ideas that predated the newly compared development. The confusion can be used as propaganda to fool even a government body.

      This isn’t the first time I have seen this sort of activity in science. If we compared all of the findings, we would find the same kind of vandalism in R&D:

      1. Research references are used in a research paper to dominate ownership:

      a. It’s strange how the concept is biased. For instance, when we research, we must free our minds and get ideas out of the either showing us the links between research and the terms regarding the concepts. What’s biased about that is some people deliberately make that look like it is a bad thing. Trust me, ideas can be independent. Or, when some reserves want an idea to look independent, it’s easily achieved without question. They simply publish the idea:

      1. The “Casimir Effect” for instance. Even if the capacitive reference can be ignored, it’s obvious the reference has to be included because of the mathematical solution by using the “Permittivity of Free Space” and “Electrostatics”. In some cases where your ideas get confounded by others, maybe at the time, the vandals were able to compare various ideas with yours and crafted ways to seem independent. Since it is vandalism, treacherous clues are left. Or the vandals are not savages and were being educated by their college professors on the subject while also working at the USPTO. Yes, like what we assumed was Einstein’s true intentions, eavesdropping and creating great opportunities to secretly plagiarize works. Maybe it’s from memories the vandals have. All that do not deserve to be referenced except the current experience that will be referenced in ownership and not someone else’s property.

      2. A post-typo abbreviation is used to slightly mimic the abbreviation of another original discovery:

      a. 123 is the post-typo abbreviation. 1C3 is another original discovery. In time, a typo is created, and the post-typo abbreviation is then triggered to become 1C3. The question is, why does it bother a researcher who uses a reference that cannot possibly break them, and make them angry? The fact is, only when we are robbed of our property are we truly angry. They break themselves by trying to covert other people’s work.

      3. The post typo abbreviation is made to be linked to similar research.

      4. The post typo abbreviation is then triggered or not. It causes the same outcome if triggered or not, hysteria, or confusion.

      What I learned from that bizarre activity from plagiarists is that research papers are trash and are not inventions, and the truth is that all references are researched and linked to inventions by the USPTO. The USPTO probably does that since all else is biased IP management that can be used to mislead people.

      Just because a researcher references a discovery in their research paper after another researcher who made the same discovery didn’t reference the research, it doesn’t mean the third or last researcher who references the work owns that similar or deemed solution. A single scientific reference used from another person’s research paper, especially one outlining “quantum vortices”, isn’t a thing at all and by no way in this universe does it impede the discovery of some functional source of information. Like the term “False Vacuum”, it is a nonexistent entity used to wow the imagination.

      It seems in history; Many scientists discovered the same thing. I can’t remember anything that concerned the inclusion of mind games, made so daringly public as the research. Such as the automobile, most of the same discoveries were inventions. We can imagine such things or inventions as being universal. Otherwise, I think they can have legs or crawl on their bellies like snakes.

      The real “Josephson effect”:

      “In physics, the Josephson effect is a phenomenon that occurs when two superconductors are placed in proximity, with some barrier or restriction between them. The effect is named after the British physicist Brian Josephson, who predicted in 1962 the mathematical relationships for the […] current and voltage across the weak link.[1][2] It is an example of a macroscopic quantum phenomenon, where the effects of quantum mechanics are observable at ordinary, rather than atomic, scale [Wikipedia; Josephson effect].”.

    • Sherman William Braithwaite
      Reply
      January 18, 2024,

      I should have read the entire article before blogging about it. I blogged about it to show hardships in science, therefore it might be alright.

      “The condensation of Cooper pairs also leads to the expulsion of magnetic fields from the superconductor—a phenomenon known as the Meissner effect—which is not explainable by merely the absence of electrical resistance. The aversion between the magnetic field and superconductivity is a mutual feeling shared by both parties, as the magnetic field […] destroys the superconducting state should the latter be unable to repel it via the Meissner effect.”. I can guess, but why is that true? My guess is the current amplitude of the field must be reasonably high. I guess I should be happy that it is somewhat mentioned in the next paragraph:

      “The magnetic fields involved have the strength of the order of a hundred Tesla for certain high-Tc superconductors. In contrast, other superconducting materials cannot withstand even much weaker fields, with a fraction of one Tesla.”.

      Hardships

      “The no-material requirement means that we are encouraged to work with “nothing” as our … well, “material.” Here, “nothing” means the most empty nothingness we can reach, that is, a vacuum. The vacuum, by definition, contains no matter, no particles, and no energy. Applying a strong magnetic field to the vacuum sounds like a hopeless idea, as the magnetic field has […] nothing to influence in it.”.

      “However, the vacuum is not entirely empty, thanks to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, a cornerstone of quantum physics. The vacuum is stirring with the activity of virtual particles that pop up and disappear for short moments, forming a boiling soup of quantum fluctuations.”.

      “…. The existence of such a solid has been hypothesized at the end of the 1980s, with a first-principle proof of its very existence lacking before our work.”.

      “A curious reader may now reasonably ask what the strength of the magnetic field required to produce this substance is? It is not something that can be made with the help of, say, a fridge magnet. And from which precisely virtual particles is it created?”.

      “To achieve the superconducting vacuum state, the magnetic fields are required to reach approximately 0.74×1020 Tesla (74 exatesla, with one exatesla being equal to unity followed by 18 zeros).”.

      Solutions are defeated before they are even found. It reminds me of the theories of warp drive. All theories and hypotheses have been defeated already.

      Some solutions are already defeated because there was no solution. That’s how science works, or some people don’t have a choice but to drive a tiny nail in by using a huge RPG? If there were low-variables potential solutions before the mix-up with high-variables potential solutions, would the former win?

      “Our findings are not just a theoretical curiosity. As hypothesized in 2021, such strong fields can exist in quantum atmospheres above the event horizons of exotic, highly magnetized black holes. Therefore, the strange superconducting-superfluid-solid-liquid state of the vacuum could have appeared in the course of the evolution of our universe or even might exist at this very moment.”.

      When people are told why the answers are missing, they do not believe it. Come to think of it, that sort of “why” is a scarcity because mostly it is a solution. That is why some solutions truly aren’t written in the stars or are the first potentials we hear about. Besides, theories say that micro black holes exist. It sounds very confounding to the research:

      https://phys.org/news/2024-01-superconductor-liquidsolid-vacuum-exatesla-strong.html

  30. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    January 21, 2024,

    “Cooper pair [Wikipedia]”

    “In condensed matter physics, a Cooper pair or BCS pair (Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer pair) is a pair of electrons (or other fermions) bound together at low temperatures in a certain manner first described in 1956 by American physicist Leon Cooper. […] Although Cooper pairing is a quantum effect, the reason for the pairing can be seen from a simplified classical explanation. […] An electron in a metal normally behaves as a free particle. The electron is repelled from other electrons due to their negative charge, but it also attracts the positive ions that make up the rigid lattice of the metal.”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_pair

    Article of Interest

    ‘I Almost Sound Like a Crazy Person, But I Think It Is a Superconductor’

    https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2024/01/theres-a-new-superconductor-claim-out-of-china-is-it-real.html

    Cooper pair. How do we detect an impossibly and definitively displaced pair of particles paring?

    I am going to quote:

    “John Robert Schrieffer… May 31, 1931 – July 27, 2019)[1] was an American physicist who, with John Bardeen and Leon Cooper, was a recipient of the 1972 Nobel Prize in Physics for developing the BCS theory, the first successful quantum theory of superconductivity [Wikipedia].”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Robert_Schrieffer

    The “BCS [Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer] theory [Wikipedia]”, was given misleading information by redefining the Cooper pair in a blatantly wrong fashion. As far as I can tell, it’s more plagiarism by using real references from the BCS [Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer] theory and remanufactured plagiarized results from other people’s research:

    “In physics, the Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) theory (named after John Bardeen, Leon Cooper, and John Robert Schrieffer) is the first microscopic theory of superconductivity since Heike Kamerlingh Onnes’s 1911 discovery. The theory describes superconductivity as a microscopic effect caused by a condensation of Cooper pairs. The theory is also used in nuclear physics to describe the pairing interaction between nucleons in an atomic nucleus.”.

    “Cooper pair [Wikipedia]” defined as “a pair of electrons” is a remanufactured plagiarized term definition:

    “The [BCS [Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer] theory] describes superconductivity as a microscopic effect caused by a condensation of Cooper pairs”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_pair

    “Bose–Einstein condensate [Wikipedia]”
    “In condensed matter physics, a Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) is a state of matter that is typically formed when a gas of bosons at very low densities is cooled to temperatures very close to absolute zero (−273.15 °C or −459.67 °F). Under such conditions, a large fraction of bosons occupy the lowest quantum state, at which microscopic quantum mechanical phenomena, particularly wavefunction interference, […] become apparent macroscopically. In condensed matter physics, a Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) is a state of matter that is typically formed when a gas of bosons at very low densities is cooled to temperatures very close to absolute zero (−273.15 °C or −459.67 °F). Under such conditions, a large fraction of bosons occupy the lowest quantum state, at which microscopic quantum mechanical phenomena, particularly wavefunction interference, become apparent macroscopically.”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose%E2%80%93Einstein_condensate

    “Leon Cooper [Wikipedia]”

    His name is also associated with the Cooper pair and the BCM theory of synaptic plasticity.[…] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Cooper

    What are Cooper pairs? They are undefined and newly defined with “associated” information from a real researcher by a plagiarist working for the USPTO.

    Why don’t I show proof? Thinking. What’s the reward for the proof?

  33. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    January 26, 2024,

    “Solid-state Battery Myths Busted”

    The actual myth concerns the true definition of solid-state electrical and electronic components:

    Solid-state components have no [physically moving or] switching parts that allow voltage, current, power, and signal [transfer between nodes].

    https://www.topspeed.com/solid-state-battery-myths-busted/

  34. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    January 27, 2024,

    Wow. Just wow.

    The PhD concept is the minor and most interesting part of Science and R&D.

    “Countering Elon Musk on Aliens: New Knowledge Does Not Just Fall Into Our Lap”

    “My point is simple: New scientific knowledge does not fall into our lap without a dedicated effort and a major investment of funds. If Musk wants to know whether we are alone, he could invest billions of dollars in developing new telescopes that would acquire the needed data.”.

    I wonder if he will do it.

    https://themessenger.com/opinion/countering-elon-musk-aliens-new-knowledge-does-not-fall-into-our-lap

  52. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    February 8, 2024,

    “Combining materials may support unique superconductivity for quantum computing”

    I have one thing to mention. The over-definition of a single set of nodes in research efforts has turned into an escape strategy to avoid the realization that it’s all a capacitive definition. Resistive, inductive, and capacitive parallel nodes are indeed interchangeable unless a short circuitry occurs when a resistive or inductive component is parallel to the nodes. It’s expressed in some spice applications. Unless the isolation of charges is within the management range of resistive or inductive components, semiconductor components can’t be used in parallel to the nodes. Otherwise, all of the defined surface or skin charges are capacitive charges. The only workaround to that is to somewhat create a functional circuit. In retrospect, a functional circuit with output nodes is created where resistive, inductive, capacitive, and semiconductor components won’t fail to avoid short circuitry.

    Even if my explanation went beyond what I meant to mention, “The over-definition of a single set of nodes in research efforts has turned into an escape strategy to avoid the realization that it’s all a capacitive definition.”. “… [Surface] or skin charges are capacitive charges.”.

    https://phys.org/news/2024-02-combining-materials-unique-superconductivity-quantum.html

  53. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    February 12, 2024,

    “Pseudogap”

    “‘”The central aim of our work was to emulate a simple text-book model to examine one of the two main interpretations of pseudogap—the energy gap without superconducting—using a system of ultracold atoms,” explains Associate Professor Hu.”.

    “The investigation of pseudogap pairing with ultracold atoms was attempted in 2010 but was unsuccessful. This new international experiment used state-of-the-art methods for preparing homogeneous Fermi clouds and removing unwanted interatomic collisions, with ultra-stable magnetic field control at unprecedented levels.”.

    https://techxplore.com/news/2024-02-quantum-mystery-high-temperature-superconductivity.html

  54. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    February 13, 2024,

    Understanding What Things Mean

    1. “The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.”:
    a. Antitrust Plaintiffs and other words:
    i. Potential meaning:
    1. Conspiracy Theorists or proposes who disagree with being rejected
    ii. Other potential meanings of Antitrust—Plaintiff and real plight—
    1. “Antitrust covers the body of laws that prohibits anti-competitive behaviour (monopoly) and unfair business practices – this includes practices that hurt business, consumers, or both, and that generally violate standards of ethical behavior. Antitrust litigation and M&A-related competition work is included in the Chambers guides.”.

  55. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    February 14, 2024,

    “Only real people can patent inventions — not AI — US government says”

    “If an inventor could show the work he or she did to get the AI chatbot to produce a specific design that enabled the remote-control car to function, then that could open the door to a patent, according to the USPTO.”.

    “The USPTO guidance builds on existing case law. A federal appeals court already held last year, in a case known as Thaler v. Vidal, that only actual people can be listed as inventors on US patents, effectively ruling out the possibility for AI to be named as an inventor or co-inventor.”.

    “In that case, the USPTO had rejected the patent applications of an inventor who had given his AI system sole credit for the inventions.”.

    https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/14/tech/billions-in-ai-patents-get-new-regulations/index.html

  57. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    February 18, 2024,

    “Satellite set to crash back to Earth next week but scientists don’t know where”

    “When the satellite eventually decides to make its big entrance, it’ll splinter into fiery bits that will mostly disappear, so there shouldn’t be much to worry about with regards to dodging falling debris.”.

    https://www.irishstar.com/news/us-news/satellite-crash-earth-next-week-32152780?utm_source=mynewsassistant.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=embedded_search_item_desktop

    “A dead satellite is hurtling back down to Earth. No one knows where it will land”

    “The ESA describes the ERS-2 reentry as ‘natural’, because it is no longer possible to control the satellite.”.

    “The only force causing ERS-2’s orbit to decay is atmospheric drag, which is influenced by unpredictable solar activity.”.

    “‘As we approach the day of reentry, we will be able to predict a time and location with increasing certainty.”.

    “‘During reentry, the satellite will break up into pieces, the majority of which will burn up. The risks associated with satellite reentries are very low.’”

    https://metro.co.uk/2024/02/16/dead-satellite-will-crash-next-week-no-one-knows-will-land-20292643/

  62. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    February 22, 2024,

    “How antimatter engines could fly humans to other stars in just a few years”

    “The idea is just that, for now. “There is currently no serious funding for advanced space propulsion concepts,” Jackson said.”. I wonder if that’s an error in the interview. There is also the notion that if it isn’t a proposal, it’s a contract from a bid.

    https://www.businessinsider.com/how-antimatter-could-work-for-interstellar-travel

  75. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    March 29, 2024,

    “Researchers find first experimental evidence for a graviton-like particle in a quantum material”

    “I am truly happy that his last genius proposal and research idea was so successful and is now published in Nature. However, it is sad that he cannot celebrate it with us. He always put a strong focus on the people behind the results.”

    https://phys.org/news/2024-03-experimental-evidence-graviton-particle-quantum.html

    “Pinczuk employed spectroscopy to study electron systems in semiconductors and insulators. He was a leader in the field of photoluminescence and resonant light scattering from solids. He studied interacting quantum fluids in semiconductor quantum well heterostructures,[6][7][8] with a focus on excitations in quantum Hall phases.[9][10] Pinczuk also applied Raman scattering to study phonons in graphene and later explored the engineering of electron states in semiconductor artificial graphene using advanced nanofabrication technology.[11][12][13]”.

    “In 1979, using resonant inelastic light scattering, Pinczuk and his colleagues made the first observation of intersubband excitations in the two dimensional electron systems of Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) heterostructures.[6][7][14]”.

    “In 1989, Pinczuk et al. distinguished intersubband spin density excitations from single particle excitations and showed that exchange Coulomb interactions in the two dimensional electron gas of GaAs microstructures were more important than previously anticipated.[8][15].”.

    “In 1993, Pinczuk and his colleagues observed long-wavelength collective excitation of the fractional quantum Hall state for the first time.[16] The resonant inelastic light scattering technique, remains one of the few methods that can directly access neutral excitations of electrons in semiconductor microstructures.[9].”.

    “Later, Pinczuk contributed to the understanding of low-lying neutral spin-conserving and spin-flip excitations of the fractional quantum Hall fluids.[10].”.

    “Pinczuk’s association with the journal Solid State Communications began in July 1989, when he joined the board of editors under founding editor Elias Burstein (who was his doctoral advisor). He was later promoted to associate editor-in-chief, working alongside Manuel Cardona. Pinczuk became chief editor of the journal in December 2004, and served through 2019.[5][17].”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aron_Pinczuk

    Notes:

    –A few days ago, while looking at a Facebook article having a list of absolute functions, I noticed one paragraph in the list concerned photons stating, ‘gravity bends light’. I thought to myself, wow, I didn’t remember that and hadn’t heard it for years. It’s genuinely a function that proves gravity is a part of a system. There certainly is not a simple route to gain that function. Mostly it’s witnessed as gravitational lensing on humungous solar and celestial bodies. I never considered that function during my research efforts and didn’t care about it because it’s as simple as imagining that photons will get bent if the right field is applied. Considering that a gravitational field is a fluxing field, and it also interacts with every form of matter, hence what if an interaction with bending photons isn’t an experiment or it can fall in line with any other function? Why experiment with one function if there are many other functions? The fact that “Electromagnetic Induction Heating [Another Facebook reference from yesterday]” is one fluxing function of an electromagnetic field, and when gravity is another dimensional function, and it can bend the photons, all that, would be one experiment. If that’s the only experiment, where is the gravitational field experiment? Maybe I deliberately blocked the “…gravitational and photonic interaction…” out of my thoughts. Then again, I don’t think the “…gravitational and photonic interaction…” was ever a thing in practiced physics. It was all theoretical and observed physics that led to more theories and hypotheses gained from minor observations–

    –My research was turned into Simulation Research after I started to realize the danger factors in my hands-on experiments. There is no room for theories concerning photon experiments in my research since it’s only Simulation Research. In that other research effort, there is no research tool–

    –This all brings to mind the conception of the Electrogravitics ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrogravitics ) term, or it might have been a term that describes a combination of heat from high-amplitude current and photon distortion of the conductive medium the current passes through, however, it might not be a photon distortion of other nearby photon sources. Then there is still an error in the experiment–

    “Electrogravitics had its origins in experiments started in 1921 by Thomas Townsend Brown (who coined the name) while he was in high school. He discovered an unusual effect while experimenting with a Coolidge tube, a type of X-ray vacuum tube where, if he placed on a balance scale with the tube’s positive electrode facing up, the tube’s mass seemed to decrease; when facing down, the tube’s mass seemed to increase.[3]”.

    –My guess is p(up), n(down), and some included n(below n(down)) cause a decrease in mass, and n(down). p(up), and some included n(below p(up)) cause an increase in mass. It makes sense because ionized charges in the vacuum is light rather than heavy. The fields’ influencing between the area in the tube allows less mass for the given area to allow a loss in mass due to the fields’ interactions. It’s a repulsive effect. In the other instance it’s an attractive effect–

    –I have seen research broadcasts and articles concerning high-amplitude currents as a gravitational field solution. However, in my research, I discovered that high-amplitude currents do not always allow a gravitational field solution. The solution is sometimes simply superconductivity. Without using the right experimental medium, “The solution is [always] simply superconductivity.”. In nature the right medium is mass. Knowing that isn’t a gravitational field solution. Only working with that leads to solutions. We won’t know what solutions our efforts bring until we find them–

  76. Sherman W. Braithwaite
    Reply
    April 3, 2024,

    “China makes ‘world’s longest-lasting plasma torch’ that could last years”

    “A simple continuous solution”

    “A research team led by Zhao Peng, a professor at the Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, has found a simple and effective solution to the cathode depletion problem.”.

    “The work done under the aegis of the Chinese Academy of Sciences developed a continuous feed system for the cathode that can rapidly replenish old, worn-out ones without interrupting the plasma torch.”.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/china-makes-world-s-longest-lasting-plasma-torch-that-could-last-years/ar-BB1kW6BQ

  77. Sherman W. Braithwaite
    Reply
    April 4, 2024,

    “MIT breakthrough: Neutrons cling to quantum dots in wild discovery”

    “Neutrons—the uncharged particles that, along with protons, make up an atom’s nucleus—are a bit of a surprise. They’re not affected by the electromagnetic force that governs most of the interactions in our world. Instead, the incredibly short-range strong force keeps them glued to the atomic nucleus. It’s so short-range that its influence barely extends beyond the dimensions of a single atom.”.

    “But now, in a wild physics twist, MIT researchers have figured out that neutrons can actually stick to way bigger structures called quantum dots. Quantum dots are like teeny-tiny crystals made up of tens of thousands of atoms. The fact that a single neutron can cling to one is blowing scientists’ minds.”.

    “The fact that [the neutrons] can be trapped by the materials, nobody seems to know about that,” remarked Li. “We were surprised that this exists, and that nobody had talked about it before, among the experts we had checked with.”.

    “Quantum dots (QDs) or semiconductor nanocrystals are semiconductor particles a few nanometres in size with optical and electronic properties that differ from those of larger particles via quantum mechanical effects. They are a central topic in nanotechnology and materials science. When a quantum dot is illuminated by UV light, an electron in the quantum dot can be excited to a state of higher energy. In the case of a semiconducting […] quantum dot, this process corresponds to the transition of an electron from the valence band to the conductance band [Wikipedia; Quantum dot].”.

    https://interestingengineering.com/science/mit-breakthrough-neutrons-cling-to-quantum-dots-in-wild-discovery

  78. Sherman W. Braithwaite
    Reply
    April 4, 2024,

    “NASA picks three companies to develop a Moon car for Artemis astronauts”

    “NASA has selected Intuitive Machines, Lunar Outpost, and Venturi Astrolab to develop the lunar terrain rover for its Artemis lunar explorations. All three companies are in the running for task orders with a potential value of $4.6 billion over the next 13 years.”.

    https://www.theverge.com/2024/4/3/24120373/nasa-artemis-astronauts-moon-car

  79. Sherman W. Braithwaite
    Reply
    April 4, 2024,

    “Lunar Roving Vehicle”

    “In addition to the flight vehicles, Boeing manufactured eight non-flight units for development and testing. One, the “Qualification Test Unit,” was a very close replica of the units that flew. Using special test chambers, engineers purposely subjected the qualification unit to conditions many times as severe as those expected on an actual mission. When the tests were finished […], given the stresses it had been subject to, the qualification unit could not safely be used in space. In 1975, NASA transferred it to the Museum.”.

    https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/lunar-roving-vehicle-qualification-test-unit/nasm_A19760746000

  82. Sherman W. Braithwaite
    Reply
    April 24, 2024,

    “Scientists Are Getting Closer to a Real, Working Warp Drive”

    “If humanity wants to be a spacefaring species, it needs to figure out how to travel faster than the speed of light.”.

    “Now, a new online toolkit — backed up by a $500,000 grant — will help engineers kickstart how humanity can achieve its faster-than-light dreams in reality.”.

    “This toolkit was created by Applied Physics, an international group of scientists, which hopes to also provide a “reality check” on warp drive concepts that rely on exotic physics.”.

    https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/rockets/a60516917/warp-factory-warp-drive/

  87. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    May 8, 2024,

    “Graphing the Object Mass Increase–G Forces Changing in Microgravity Due to Acceleration–”

    “It’s just my guess due to the solution not being found through the search query, it’s the same solution as Einstein’s Field Equations. In retrospect, the Increase in Mass allowed by the equation most likely exists in part as some other solution since it is a part of the original equation, and the increase in perspective mass is used to explain another outcome beyond simply solving the equation.”.

    https://www.academia.edu/118651577/Graphing_the_Object_Mass_Increase_G_Forces_Changing_in_Microgravity_Due_to_Acceleration_

  88. Sherman William Braithwaite
    Reply
    May 8, 2024,

    “Startup Claims Discovery of New Force for Propellant-Free Thrusters”

    “However, the reported output of this force is currently a modest 10 milliNewtons. To put this into perspective, an average medium-sized apple held in your hand exerts approximately 1 Newton, which is about 100 times the force this new technology can presently generate. The minute amount of force produced has been downplayed by Buhler, who argued that “in space, anything greater than zero will move objects.”

    https://trendydigests.com/2024/05/08/startup-claims-discovery-of-new-force-for-propellant-free-thrusters/

    “Former NASA engineer claims he invented a ground-breaking thruster that doesn’t need fuel”

    “Charles Buhler, one of the co-founders of the startup, recently told The Debrief that he and his team have discovered this new force and that it will be “this force that we will use to propel objects for the next 1,000 years.” Again, that is a very bold claim, especially considering that the results so far show this “new force of nature” is only capable of delivering a whopping 10 milliNewtons.”.

    https://bgr.com/science/former-nasa-engineer-claims-he-invented-a-ground-breaking-thruster-that-doesnt-need-fuel/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *